0.09/0.10 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.09/0.10 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 240 THM 0.09/0.31 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu 0.09/0.31 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.09/0.31 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.09/0.31 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.09/0.31 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.09/0.31 % CPULimit : 1920 0.09/0.31 % WCLimit : 240 0.09/0.31 % DateTime : Wed Jul 30 05:59:49 EDT 2025 0.15/0.31 % CPUTime : 0.16/0.42 Running higher-order theorem proving 0.16/0.47 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=240 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.dkPd1X05gh/E---3.1_2177.p 0.16/0.53 # Version: 3.0.0-ho 0.16/0.53 # Preprocessing class: HSLMSMSMSSMNHFA. 0.16/0.53 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 8 cores with 240 seconds (1920 total) 0.16/0.53 # Starting full_lambda_6 with 960s (4) cores 0.16/0.53 # Starting additional_ho_6 with 240s (1) cores 0.16/0.53 # Starting new_ho_9 with 240s (1) cores 0.16/0.53 # Starting full_lambda_3 with 240s (1) cores 0.16/0.53 # Starting post_as_ho6 with 240s (1) cores 0.16/0.53 # additional_ho_6 with pid 2257 completed with status 0 0.16/0.53 # Result found by additional_ho_6 0.16/0.53 # Preprocessing class: HSLMSMSMSSMNHFA. 0.16/0.53 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 8 cores with 240 seconds (1920 total) 0.16/0.53 # Starting full_lambda_6 with 960s (4) cores 0.16/0.53 # Starting additional_ho_6 with 240s (1) cores 0.16/0.53 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,4.0,,2,20000,1.0) 0.16/0.53 # Search class: HGHSM-FSLF31-MHFFFSBN 0.16/0.53 # partial match(1): HGHSM-FSLM31-MHFFFSBN 0.16/0.53 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 240 seconds (240 total) 0.16/0.53 # Starting new_ho_10 with 145s (1) cores 0.16/0.53 # new_ho_10 with pid 2263 completed with status 0 0.16/0.53 # Result found by new_ho_10 0.16/0.53 # Preprocessing class: HSLMSMSMSSMNHFA. 0.16/0.53 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 8 cores with 240 seconds (1920 total) 0.16/0.53 # Starting full_lambda_6 with 960s (4) cores 0.16/0.53 # Starting additional_ho_6 with 240s (1) cores 0.16/0.53 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,4.0,,2,20000,1.0) 0.16/0.53 # Search class: HGHSM-FSLF31-MHFFFSBN 0.16/0.53 # partial match(1): HGHSM-FSLM31-MHFFFSBN 0.16/0.53 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 240 seconds (240 total) 0.16/0.53 # Starting new_ho_10 with 145s (1) cores 0.16/0.53 # Preprocessing time : 0.003 s 0.16/0.53 # Presaturation interreduction done 0.16/0.53 0.16/0.53 # Proof found! 0.16/0.53 # SZS status Theorem 0.16/0.53 # SZS output start CNFRefutation 0.16/0.53 thf(decl_sort1, type, secrecy_Expression: $tType). 0.16/0.53 thf(decl_sort2, type, secrecy_KS: $tType). 0.16/0.53 thf(decl_sort3, type, secrecy_Keys: $tType). 0.16/0.53 thf(decl_sort4, type, list_S529945141ession: $tType). 0.16/0.53 thf(decl_sort5, type, secrecy_specID: $tType). 0.16/0.53 thf(decl_36, type, knowle945212990e_know: secrecy_specID > secrecy_KS > $o). 0.16/0.53 thf(decl_37, type, knowle731562421_knows: secrecy_specID > list_S529945141ession > $o). 0.16/0.53 thf(decl_66, type, cons_S112077679ession: secrecy_Expression > list_S529945141ession > list_S529945141ession). 0.16/0.53 thf(decl_72, type, nil_Se901661471ession: list_S529945141ession). 0.16/0.53 thf(decl_124, type, secrecy_kE: secrecy_Keys > secrecy_Expression). 0.16/0.53 thf(decl_126, type, secrec1016742679ession: secrecy_KS > secrecy_Expression). 0.16/0.53 thf(decl_127, type, secrecy_kKS: secrecy_Keys > secrecy_KS). 0.16/0.53 thf(decl_140, type, a: secrecy_specID). 0.16/0.53 thf(decl_141, type, m: secrecy_Keys). 0.16/0.53 thf(fact_7_know1k, axiom, ![X69:secrecy_specID, X623:secrecy_Keys]:(((knowle731562421_knows @ X69 @ (cons_S112077679ession @ (secrec1016742679ession @ (secrecy_kKS @ X623)) @ nil_Se901661471ession))<=>(knowle945212990e_know @ X69 @ (secrecy_kKS @ X623)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.dkPd1X05gh/E---3.1_2177.p', fact_7_know1k)). 0.16/0.53 thf(fact_13_KS2Expression_Osimps_I1_J, axiom, ![X70:secrecy_Keys]:(((secrec1016742679ession @ (secrecy_kKS @ X70))=(secrecy_kE @ X70))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.dkPd1X05gh/E---3.1_2177.p', fact_13_KS2Expression_Osimps_I1_J)). 0.16/0.53 thf(conj_0, conjecture, (knowle945212990e_know @ a @ (secrecy_kKS @ m)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.dkPd1X05gh/E---3.1_2177.p', conj_0)). 0.16/0.53 thf(fact_0_assms, axiom, (knowle731562421_knows @ a @ (cons_S112077679ession @ (secrecy_kE @ m) @ nil_Se901661471ession)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.dkPd1X05gh/E---3.1_2177.p', fact_0_assms)). 0.16/0.53 thf(c_0_4, plain, ![X961:secrecy_specID, X962:secrecy_Keys]:(((~(knowle731562421_knows @ X961 @ (cons_S112077679ession @ (secrec1016742679ession @ (secrecy_kKS @ X962)) @ nil_Se901661471ession))|(knowle945212990e_know @ X961 @ (secrecy_kKS @ X962)))&(~(knowle945212990e_know @ X961 @ (secrecy_kKS @ X962))|(knowle731562421_knows @ X961 @ (cons_S112077679ession @ (secrec1016742679ession @ (secrecy_kKS @ X962)) @ nil_Se901661471ession))))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_7_know1k])])])). 0.16/0.53 thf(c_0_5, plain, ![X970:secrecy_Keys]:(((secrec1016742679ession @ (secrecy_kKS @ X970))=(secrecy_kE @ X970))), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[fact_13_KS2Expression_Osimps_I1_J])). 0.16/0.53 thf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, ~(knowle945212990e_know @ a @ (secrecy_kKS @ m)), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_0])])). 0.16/0.53 thf(c_0_7, plain, ![X69:secrecy_specID, X3:secrecy_Keys]:(((knowle945212990e_know @ X69 @ (secrecy_kKS @ X3))|~((knowle731562421_knows @ X69 @ (cons_S112077679ession @ (secrec1016742679ession @ (secrecy_kKS @ X3)) @ nil_Se901661471ession))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])). 0.16/0.53 thf(c_0_8, plain, ![X3:secrecy_Keys]:(((secrec1016742679ession @ (secrecy_kKS @ X3))=(secrecy_kE @ X3))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])). 0.16/0.53 thf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, ~(knowle945212990e_know @ a @ (secrecy_kKS @ m)), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])). 0.16/0.53 thf(c_0_10, plain, ![X69:secrecy_specID, X3:secrecy_Keys]:(((knowle945212990e_know @ X69 @ (secrecy_kKS @ X3))|~((knowle731562421_knows @ X69 @ (cons_S112077679ession @ (secrecy_kE @ X3) @ nil_Se901661471ession))))), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7, c_0_8])). 0.16/0.53 thf(c_0_11, plain, (knowle731562421_knows @ a @ (cons_S112077679ession @ (secrecy_kE @ m) @ nil_Se901661471ession)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[fact_0_assms])). 0.16/0.53 thf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, ~((knowle945212990e_know @ a @ (secrecy_kKS @ m))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])). 0.16/0.53 thf(c_0_13, plain, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10, c_0_11]), c_0_12]), ['proof']). 0.16/0.53 # SZS output end CNFRefutation 0.16/0.53 # Parsed axioms : 490 0.16/0.53 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 426 0.16/0.53 # Initial clauses : 139 0.16/0.53 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 6 0.16/0.53 # Initial clauses in saturation : 133 0.16/0.53 # Processed clauses : 164 0.16/0.53 # ...of these trivial : 3 0.16/0.53 # ...subsumed : 9 0.16/0.53 # ...remaining for further processing : 152 0.16/0.53 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 27 0.16/0.53 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0 0.16/0.53 # Backward-subsumed : 0 0.16/0.53 # Backward-rewritten : 0 0.16/0.53 # Generated clauses : 39 0.16/0.53 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 10 0.16/0.53 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0 0.16/0.53 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0 0.16/0.53 # Paramodulations : 13 0.16/0.53 # Factorizations : 0 0.16/0.53 # NegExts : 0 0.16/0.53 # Equation resolutions : 33 0.16/0.53 # Disequality decompositions : 0 0.16/0.53 # Total rewrite steps : 20 0.16/0.53 # ...of those cached : 11 0.16/0.53 # Propositional unsat checks : 0 0.16/0.53 # Propositional check models : 0 0.16/0.53 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0 0.16/0.53 # Propositional clauses : 0 0.16/0.53 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0 0.16/0.53 # Propositional unsat core size : 0 0.16/0.53 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000 0.16/0.53 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000 0.16/0.53 # Propositional solver time : 0.000 0.16/0.53 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000 0.16/0.53 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000 0.16/0.53 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000 0.16/0.53 # Current number of processed clauses : 25 0.16/0.53 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 6 0.16/0.53 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0 0.16/0.53 # Negative unit clauses : 5 0.16/0.53 # Non-unit-clauses : 14 0.16/0.53 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 89 0.16/0.53 # ...number of literals in the above : 309 0.16/0.53 # Current number of archived formulas : 0 0.16/0.53 # Current number of archived clauses : 110 0.16/0.53 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1610 0.16/0.53 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 625 0.16/0.53 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 7 0.16/0.53 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 11 0.16/0.53 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0 0.16/0.53 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0 0.16/0.53 # BW rewrite match successes : 0 0.16/0.53 # Condensation attempts : 164 0.16/0.53 # Condensation successes : 0 0.16/0.53 # Termbank termtop insertions : 19895 0.16/0.53 # Search garbage collected termcells : 7393 0.16/0.53 0.16/0.53 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.16/0.53 # User time : 0.022 s 0.16/0.53 # System time : 0.004 s 0.16/0.53 # Total time : 0.026 s 0.16/0.53 # Maximum resident set size: 3644 pages 0.16/0.53 0.16/0.53 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.16/0.53 # User time : 0.040 s 0.16/0.53 # System time : 0.005 s 0.16/0.53 # Total time : 0.045 s 0.16/0.53 # Maximum resident set size: 2824 pages 0.16/0.53 % E exiting 0.16/0.53 % E exiting 0.16/0.53 EOF